Have you heard of the stem cell controversy? Well, the research on this subject was actually aimed to find cure for so many types of diseases. In fact, growing limbs, healing bones or the spinal cord, healing various organs, growing new skin on the bodies of people who got their skin burnt seem to be possible with the help of this cure. The possibilities are endless as per what the research till now suggests. If that is so, why is there a controversy and why is this particular topic attracting negative attention from all circles?
In fact, the stem cell controversy had garnered negative attention in the last few years and it has quite a lot of advocates as well as opponents. Well, the main reason for the controversy is the method which is generally employed to obtain the cells in order to carry out with the whole process. The method involved seems to be controversial. The whole process involves converting cells into tissues in several parts of the body. In the initial process, the cells that are required to go ahead with the process were obtained from an aborted embryo which is a result of fertility treatment. So, it means that the batch of stem cells is actually obtained by destroying an embryo and this whole process is actually considered as a sin.
This is the reason why there is lots of opposition predominantly from the religious groups. Of course, in many countries this is against the sentiments of the common man too. At a particular phase, even the research was halted because of the opposition and criticism this method has actually faced. Even the funding process for the research had been halted several times whenever the pressure increased from various opposition groups. Such conditions have actually forced the scientists to research for other alternatives. Maybe that is the reason why scientists have come up with another alternative which would be extraction of multi-potent cells. They can be found in several parts of the body like the bone marrow and the skin.
Of course, such cells must also be manipulated in the laboratory before they become eligible to carry on with the treatment process. As this process does not involve destruction of an embryo, this method was not so opposed by the opposition groups. Frankly speaking, destruction of an embryo implies destruction of an unborn life. In order to obtain batches of cells, killing an embryo seemed to be the fuel for many hot discussions and controversies. Right now, research on the subject is still considered to be in its preliminary stages and that is the reason why it is better to wait for some more time to conclude that alternative methods really work well for the treatment process. If such methods really work as per expectations, then lots of diseases and illnesses can be cured successfully with this kind of a treatment. This is the reason why, scientists are constantly working on finding more methods which are less controversial and more trustworthy.
Several developments have occurred in recent times regarding stem cell controversy and the way human embryos are treated. Stem cell research forms to be the epicenter of all these dubious features. Firstly, the research involves creating, developing, using and destroying human embryos manually. Though the intention is a noble one reflecting the advanced ways of seeking protection human health issues, the process in which it is conducted contradicts with several traditional, religious and orthodox views. Stem cells possess the ability of curing any major illnesses by replacing the traumatic, dead or damaged cells.
Rising Uproar across the World with Citing Unethical Practice
Health specialists that multiple benefits are obtained with the serious consideration of serious stem cell research in detail. However, not all research studies involve the creation of embryos. There are certain instances during which the research is confined to stem cells of a person alone to determine whether they could be considered as a better replacement for the current ones. Global authorities belonging to various organizations have sought better alternatives instead of embryo creation and destruction. Several aspects are considered in this regard such as adult stem cells instead of embryonic stem cells.
People advocating towards better life standards are of the opinion that there is no entity can deny the right to live. Hence, the process of conducting research by creating embryos has to be annulled immediately. The claims have been on the rise that there have been no significant proofs that a person could be better protected by making use of embryonic stem cells. Successful treatment could be offered in a perfect manner if only advanced research is made regarding adult stem cells. They are of the staunch belief that the results obtained in this regard too have been effective so far.
Stem Cell Controversy from Religious Perspectives
With people from different backgrounds have already been stepping up their furor, the likes of religious organizations too have been unrelenting. Some even clearly stated that the entire research through creating embryos must be banned completely. The views from Bible too have depicted clearly that the human lives are created with the image of God considered in the first place. In view of such high level feelings, it is utterly immoral to resort such illegal processes. Other organizations too are of the opinion that such a research should never be given way because embryos in any stage anticipate reverence.
Respecting one’s own right to live, there should be no scope given for such researches in the first place. If the embryonic cells have to be procured, then destroying the concerned embryo is unavoidable. Citing this very reason to be most objectionable, there are numerous people and organizations voicing against such research. All these baffling developments have even started rift among scientific groups with most of them conflicting over future clinical trials. Meanwhile, the process of cloning embryonic stem cells has already started taking a firms shape after adult stem cells were used for this process. More research is necessary in this regard to get a clear idea about future requirements without leading to anymore stem cell controversy.